Twenty-five states urge Supreme Court to hear case fighting Maryland firearms ban

Biden responds to news of Justice Breyer retirement

Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy discusses Biden’s reaction to announcement of Justice Breyer retiring on ‘Special Report.’

FIRST ON FOX: Arizona and West Virginia are leading a group of 25 states urging the Supreme Court to hear a case challenging Maryland’s strict firearms law.

“Americans do not require approval from a local jurisdiction to exercise their constitutional rights,” Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said in a press release. “We must vigorously oppose this type of misguided overreach at all levels of government.”

The Supreme Court
(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

The 25 states are urging the Supreme Court to hear Bianchi v. Frosh, which challenges Maryland’s Firearms Safety Act of 2013. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld the Maryland law in September, prompting the appeal to the Supreme Court.

Maryland’s 2013 law is one of the strictest in the country, requiring that residents undergo safety training and fingerprinting before being granted a license to buy a pistol. It also attempts to define assault weapons, banning the sale of firearms such as the AR-15 and similar rifles while also restricting magazine capacity to 10 rounds of ammunition.

The law also bans firearms with features the 25 states argue actually serve to enhance gun safety, including folding stocks and flash hiders.

AR-15 rifles are displayed for sale at the Guntoberfest gun show in Oaks, Pa.
(Reuters/Joshua Roberts)

Other states joining Arizona and West Virginia include Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wyoming.

They argue that the Maryland law compromises “the Second Amendment rights of millions of citizens” and bans firearms that “benefit public safety, counterbalance the threat of illegal gun violence and help make our streets safer.”

A legal brief cites the 2008 landmark District of Columbia v. Heller case, which resulted in the Supreme Court ruling that individuals unconnected to military service or a militia had the right to possess firearms for lawful purposes, arguing that the ruling should be clarified to extend to sporting rifles in “common use.”

Seated from left are Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Standing from left are Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. 
(Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool)

The press release notes that many of the firearms banned under Maryland’s law fit the common use definition, noting that 42 other states currently allow for their possession.

“SCOTUS should not allow a state to invade its own citizens’ constitutional rights,” the release states. “If left untouched, Maryland’s unconstitutional ban on firearms and the Fourth Circuit’s erroneous standard threaten the constitutional rights of all Americans. Arizona and forty-two other states allow the commonly-used firearms that Maryland has banned outright.”

A 2017 study “found that the law was associated with a significant reduction in the trafficking of handguns into the underground crime gun market,” according to the Center for American Progress.

Source: Read Full Article